Analysis of the Impact Fiscal Fundamentals on Unemployment in Nigeria. Imperatives for Covid 19, Era
Patrick Ologbenla
Department of Accounting, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile Ife. Osun State Nigeria.
ORCID: 0000-0001-8127-3155
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i5-22
ABSTRACT:
The study examined the impact of fiscal fundamental on unemployment rate in Nigeria from 1980 to 2020 focusing on COVID-19 imperatives. The research work embraces OLS estimating techniques to estimate the relationship between the variables. The result of the analysis revealed that government expenditure had positive and significant effect on the rate of unemployment. Also government revenue had a positive but insignificant impact on unemployment during. The implication of these findings for COVID-19 is that the narrative which is obtained from the analysis needs to be changed. Government revenue should be made to have significant impact on unemployment. The pandemic has led to a lot of job lost and the unemployment rate in Nigeria has risen by about 55% peaking at 36% youth unemployment rate as at last quarter of 2020. The study therefore, recommends that government should refocus expenditure and revenue in the country in such a way it will target development of infrastructural facilities so as to increase productivity and in turn facilitate employment generation.
KEYWORDS:
Fiscal Policy, Unemployment, COVID-19, Government Expenditure.
REFERENCES:
1) Barro, R. G. & Sala-i-Martin. (1992). Public finance in models of economic growth, Review of Economic Studies, 59, 645-
661.
2) Ball, L. (2000). Policy rules for open economies. In J. B. Taylor (Ed.), monetary policy rules, pp. 127.156. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press for NBER.
3) Becklemans, L. (2005). Credit and monetary policy: Australian SVAR. Reserve BanAustralia Research Discussion Paper
Series, 1, 2-9.
4) Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) Statistical Bulletin (2016). Edition.
5) Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN). (2009). Statistical bulletin golden Jubilee Edition. Abuja: CBN.
6) Clements, M. P., Leign, H. & Flores, D. F. (2009). Forecasting in cointegrated systems. Journal of Applied Econometrics,
10(5), 127–146.
7) Clements, M. P. & Hendry, D. F. (1995). Forecasting in cointegrated systems. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 10(5),
127–146.
8) Easterly, W. & Rebelo, S. (1993). Fiscal policy and economic growth: An empirical investigation, Journal of Monetary
Economics, 32, 417-458.
9) Elbourne, A. (2007). The UK housing market and the monetary policy transmission mechanism: An SVAR approach.
Journal of Housing Economics, 17(2008), 65-87.
10) Fève, P. & Guay, A. (2006). The response of hour to technology shock: SVAR approach. Money Credit bank, 5(1), 958-
1103.
11) Gelb, A. H. (1988). Oil windfalls: blessing or curse, Oxford University Press (for World Bank), Oxford.
12) Gosse, M. T. & Guillamin, L. Y. (2012). Will natural gas prices decouple from oil prices across the pond? IMF working
paper, WP/11/143.
13) Gylfason, T. (2001). Natural resources, education, and economic development. European Economic Review, 45, 847–59.
14) Ibrahim, H. M. & Amin, M. R. (2005). Exchange rate, monetary policy and manufacturing output in Malaysia. Journal of
Economic Cooperation, 26(3), 103-130.
15) Kinnunen, J., Lofgren, H., Victor Sulla. & Dino Merotto. (2013). External shocks, fiscal policy and income distribution:
alternative scenarios for Moldova. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 6365.
16) Lucas, R. (1988). An equilibrium model of the business cycle. Journal of Political Economy, 83, 1113-1144.
17) Mahmud, H. (2009). Oil price shocks and monetary policy aggregates in Nigeria: A structural VAR approach. Munich
Personal RePEc Archive, 45-56.
18) Mordi, C. N. O. & Adebiyi, M. A. (2010). The Asymmetric effects of oil price shocks on output and prices in Nigeria using
a structural VAR model. Central Bank of Nigeria Economic and Financial Review, 48(1), 1-32.
19) Ngalawa, H. & Viegi, N. (2011). Dynamic effects of monetary policy shocks in Malawi. South African Journal of
Economics, 79(3), 244-250.
20) Obinyeluaku, M. & Viegi, N. (2012). Fiscal policy for managing oil revenues in Nigeria. Economic Research of South
Africa. Working paper No. 2.
21) Obinyeluaku, M. I. (2009). Testing the fiscal theory of price level in Nigeria”, University of KwaZulu-Natal Discussion
Papers Series, No. 58.
22) Olasunkanmi, O. I. & Babatunde, O. A. (2013). Empirical analysis shocks and current account dynamics in Nigeria. African
Research Review, 7(1).
23) Olomola, P. (2006). Oil wealth and economic growth in African oil exporting countries. A.E.R.G Research Paper, 170, 23-
45.
24) Papademous, L. (2008). The contribution of monetary policy to economic growth. European Central bank Conference
Paper.
25) Peersman, G. & Smet, F. (2002). The industry effects of monetary policy in the Euro-Area. European Bank Working
Paper, 65, 34-56.
26) Sidrauski, M. (2003). Rational choice and patterns of growth in a monetary economy. American Economic Review, 57(2),
534–544.
27) Sims, C. A. (1980). Are forecasting models usable for policy analysis? Quarterly review of Federal Reserve Bank of
Minneapolis, 10(1), 2-16.
28) Tobin, J. (1965). Money and economic growth, Econometrica, 33, 671-684.
29) Usenobong, F. A. & Johnson, A. A. (2015). Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy shock in Nigeria: A SVAR approach.
International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 4(3), 109-120.
30) Uhlig, H. (2005). What are the effects of monetary policy on output? Results from an agnostic identification procedure.
Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(6), 381–419.
31) Vonnak, B. (2005). Estimating the effects of Hungarian monetary policy within a structural VAR framework. Magyar
Nemzeti Bank Working Paper Series, 1, 1-37.