Estimationof a Tax Compliance Index with Specific Application to Pay-As-You-Earn
1Cathrine T Koloane,2Mangalani P Makananisa
1Masters in Business Leadership in the Graduate School of Business Leadership, University of South Africa, South AfricaMasters Student in the College of Agriculture, Engineering and Science at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
2MSc in Statistics at the University of South Africa, South Africa
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i2-04
ABSTRACT:
This article provides a composite index for Pay-As-You-Earn (PAYE)tax using Principal Components Analysis (PCA). The study uses time series from April 2012 to March 2020 (using monthly data) for the ratios derived from the four compliancemeasures namely, payments on time, registration on time, filing on time and accurate declarations. The index is computed using the weights of the four derived principal components. According to the model results, the PAYE tax compliance index averages around 75.0% for the period, with the lowest value of 72.3% in 2013/14 and the highestvalue of 77.1% achieved in 2018/19. There is a clear upward trend, indicating improving levels of compliance in PAYE. Similarly, setting the baseline index of 100 i.e. assuming 100% compliance for 2012/13, results in PAYE tax compliance index averaging around 101.6% for the period, with the lowest value of 97.72% in 2013/14 and the highest value of 104.26% achieved in 2018/19. The study recommends this methodology to be applied to all the tax products and that the overall tax compliance index be computed. This will assist tax authorities all over the world to actively monitor tax compliance levels and institute timeous corrective measures in order to address non-compliance and ultimately maximise PAYE revenue collections. Moreover, this study also serve as a base for many of the future tax compliance indices studies.
KEYWORDS:
PAYE Tax Compliance Index, Pay-As-You-Earn, Principal Components Analysis, Normalisation, Standardisation
REFERENCES:
1) African Response. 2006. FinScope small business survey report Gauteng 2006. South Africa. Available from :< http://www.finscope.co.za/sme.html>.
2) Crossman, A. 2019. How to Construct an Index for Research. New York: Thought Co. Available from :< https://www.thoughtco.com/index-for-research-3026543>.
3) de Senna, L.D., Maia, A.G. and de Medeiros, J.D.F.2019. ‘The use of principal component analysis for the construction of the Water Poverty Index’, Brazilian Journal of Water Resources, 24(19):1-14.
4) Forum on Tax Administration. 2004. Guidance Note. Compliance Risk Management: Managing and Improving Tax Compliance. London: Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, OECD.
5) James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T. and Tibshirani, R. 2013. An introduction to statistical learning. 1st Edition, Springer. USA.
6) Johnson, R.A. and Wichern, D.W. 2007. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 6th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall. USA
7) OECD. 2008. Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators. Methodology and user guide. Paris: OECD Publications.
8) Perez-Foguet, A. and Gin Garriga, R.G.2011. ‘Analyzing water poverty in basins’, Water Resources Management, 25(14):3595-3612.
9) SAARF. 2009. The SAARF AMPS Living Standards Measure (LSM). South Africa Available from:
10) SAIT. 2020. Tax Compliance. South Africa: Pretoria. Available from :< https://www.thesait.org.za/news/524096/Tax-Compliance.htm>.
11) Saltelli A. 2007. ‘Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy’, Social Indicators Research, 81:65-77.
12) STATSSA. 2016. How important is your tax money? South Africa: Pretoria. Available from :< http://www.statssa.gov.za/?p=9155>.
13) United Nations Development Programme.2019. Human Development Reports. Human Development Index (HDI). Available from :< http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi>.
