The Indigenous People’s Innovation Copyright and Legal Consequences: A case study of the plant chopper machine in Mulia Asih Farmer Group, Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
1Suriansyah Murhaini, 2 Bhayu Rhama,3Herry Panca Jaya, 4Ferry Setiawan
1,2,3,4Universitas Palangka Raya, Kota Palangka Raya, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i10-30ABSTRACT:
Agrotourism is a tourism activity that combines plantation or agricultural activities by offering unique experiences to visitors. Indonesia, which has natural resources in the plantation and agricultural sectors, provides great opportunities for the community, one of which is implemented by the Mulia Asih Farmer Group in Humbang Raya Village, Central Kalimantan. Agricultural and plantation activities require fertilizer as an important component in increasing crop production, and there are even demands for environmentally friendly use of organic fertilizer or compost as an advantage so that people innovate to create organic fertilizer processing machines from the surrounding environment. This article uses a qualitative approach to discuss the findings of local communities and analyze them with the copyright law which regulates the copyright of photographic works and portraits taken without permission. Article 12 paragraph (1) of the Copyright Law regulates economic rights to portraits, there must be written consent from the person being photographed or their heirs for reproduction, distribution, announcements, commercial use, and/or communications used for billboards, advertisements, banners, pamphlets and more. The results of this study show that the public has not realized unintentional errors due to limited information so that the innovations made are claimed to be their own work even though they have previously been discovered by other communities.
KEYWORDS:
Enumeration Machine, Legal Consequences
REFERENCES:
1) Arafah, S. (2003). Kajian penggunaan jerami dan pupuk N, P, dan K pada Lahan Sawah Irigasi. Jurnal Ilmu Tanah Dan Lingkungan, 4(1), 15–24.
2) Ariana lukito. (2013). Kiat Sukses Usaha Ternak Sapi potong skala kecil. 1 ed. Trans Idea Publishing.
3) Batista. (2021). Copyright Protection of Graffiti Art in Brazil: The Limitation of a Copyright Limitation? IIC, 52, 977–982. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-021-01092-4
4) Bhayu, R. (2020). The meta-analysis of Ecotourism in National Parks. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure.
5) Burk, D. I. (2007). E-Books and Techinical Protection Measures Comparing the Situation in the United States and Japan. Munich Intellectual Property Law Center.
6) Di Valentino, L. (2016). Laying the foundation for copyright policy and practice in Canadian universities. Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, 4312. https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4312/
7) Eewag. (2017). Proses Pengolahan Sampah Organik dengan Black Soldier Fly (BSF). Eawag – Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology.
8) Margono, S. (2002). Hak Cipta. CV. Novindo Pustaka Mandiri.
9) Riswadi, B. A. (2017). Pembatasan Dan Pengecualian Hak Cipta Di Era Digital. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.
10) Saidin, O. (2015). Aspek Hukum Hak Kekayaan Intelektua. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
11) Soeroso. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Sinar Grafika.
12) Supramono, G. (2020). Hak Cipta dan Aspek – Aspek Hukumnya. Rineka Cipta.
13) Uğur, N. G., & Akbıyık, A. (2020). Impacts of COVID-19 on global tourism industry: A cross-regional comparison. Tourism Management Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100744
14) Zemer, L. (2017). The Making of A New Copyright Lockean. Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 29(45).
