Tourists’ Decision Making in Choosing Destination Place
Virginia Mandasari
UPN Veteran Jawa Timur, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i10-20ABSTRACT:
Recently, the tourism industry is one of the largest industries and a services sector with the most rapid growth rates in the world. The purpose of this research is to understand what factors determine tourists when choosing a tourist destination in Lembang, Bandung. Qualitative methodology was chosen and analyzed with case study. In this research, a destination place which becomes popular rapidly selected as a case study because many photos that taking in that destination going viral. The data is collected by conducted interviews with tourist that visiting an attractive destination in Lembang. In order to decrease the data bias, interview was conducted in that destination. The findings in this research, current tourists, especially tourists who visit Bandung, prefer a destination place that can provide uniqueness which is they can not acquired in other destinations. Uniqueness will help them to get interesting photos for their next upload on their own social media.
KEYWORDS:
destination; tourism; Bandung; Decision Making
REFERENCES:
Journal
1) Brotherton, B. (2008). Researching Hospitality and Tourism: A Student Guide, Sage Publications Inc.
2) Hermawan, P. and Mandasari, V. 2018. Role of Elektronic Word-of-Mouth in Determining Destination Place to Visit: A
Study in Lembang, Bandung. Sustainable Collaboration in Business, Technology, Information and Innovation (SCBTII)
proceeding.
3) Kumar, R. (2011). Research Methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners, CA: Sage Publications, 3rd ed.
4) Litvin, S. W., Goldsmith, R. E., and Pana, B. (2008). Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management.
Tourism Management, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 458-468.
5) Mangold, W. G. and Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social Media: the new hybrid element of the promotion mix, Business Horizons,
Vol. 52 Issue 04, pp. 357-365.
6) Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. M. Given (Ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. (Vol. 2). Sage: Los Angeles, pp. 697-8.
7) Pantano, E. and Di Pietro, L. (2013). From e-tourism to f-tourism: emerging issues from negative tourists’ online
reviews, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Technology, Vol. 04 Issue 03, pp. 211-227.
8) Simonson, I. and Rosen, E. (2014). What Marketers misunderstand about online reviews, Harvard Business Review,
January-February 2014, pp. 23-25.
Book
1) Creswell, John W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches (2nd Ed.).
Thousand Oaks, California: SagePublications.
2) Hasan, A. (2010). Marketing dari Mulut ke Mulut, cet. 1. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
3) Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing Management (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International Editions.
4) Kotler, P and Amstrong. (2001). Prinsip – Prinsip Pemasaran, jilid I. Jakarta: Erlangga
5) Kotler, P. dan K. L. Keller (2012). Marketing Management. Fourteenth Edition, London.
6) Pearson Education Limited.
7) Tjiptono, Fandy. (2002). Manajemen Jasa. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset
8) Yoeti, O. A. (1996). Pengantar Ilmu Pariwisata. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.
9) Wells, W. and Prensky, D. (1996). Consumer Behavior. J. Wiley