Koperasi Pegawai Republik Indonesia (KPRI) Member Participation on Cooperative Development in Mataram
1Yulinda Ramdlan,2 Muhammad Irwan,
3Ihsan Ro’is
1,2,3Master of Economic, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Mataram
https://doi.org/10.47191/jefms/v4-i10-18ABSTRACT:
This study aims to determine the participation of KPRI members on the development of cooperatives in Mataram City, the responses of members after interviews. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach. This study uses a descriptive qualitative method with a case study approach. Data collection techniques are interviews, observation and documentation.
The results of the study generally show that the participation of members in saving their capital is very good, it is shown that they always pay principal savings, mandatory savings and voluntary savings. With the high participation of members in saving their capital, it shows that members have confidence in the cooperative as a member's money saving institution. Meanwhile, the results of the research on the participation of members in attending the annual members' meeting were very good, as indicated by the results of interviews and data processing conducted by researchers. although there are still members who do not attend the annual member meeting because they are sick, have permission and some are out of town on duty. It is very good for members' participation in participating in this member's meeting because the management disseminates invitation letters regarding the implementation of the RAT, and the management gives prizes or door prizes to members who attend the RAT. As for the participation of members in utilizing the cooperative's business services, it is considered good, members always use the business unit and they have become loyal customers to shop and transact at the KPRI Multipurpose, Kencana and Lentera business units. However, some of the business units in KPRI Serbaguna experienced a decrease in income, but according to the head of the cooperative, this decline did not have an impact on the loss of the cooperative's business. The good participation of members in utilizing this business unit is because the services provided by the management are very good and the management works honestly and openly.
KEYWORDS:
Analysis, KPRI Member Participation, Cooperative Development
REFERENCES:
1) Anoraga, Panji dan Nanik Widiyati. (2013). Dinamika Koperasi. Rineka Cipta.Jakarta.
2) Any Meilani dan Sri Ismulyaty. (2012). Hubungan antara Faktor Anggota dan Partisipasi terhadap Keberhasilan Usaha Koperasi
di Kabupaten Bogor. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Terbuka.
3) Arifin Sitio dan Halomoan Tamba. (2011). Koperasi: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Erlangga.
4) Arifin. (2014). Teori keuangan dan Pasar modal. Yogyakarta: Ekonisia.
5) Arsad Matdoan. (2011). Pengaruh Partisipasi dan Kepuasan Anggota terhadap Kinerja Koperasi Unit Desa (KUD) di Kota Ambon.
Skripsi. UNPAD.
6) Danang Sunyoto. (2017). Analisis Regresi dan Korelasi Bivariat. Yogyakarta: Amara Books.
7) Endang Mulyatiningsih. (2011). Riset Terapan Bidang Pendidikan & Teknik.
8) Yogyakarta: UNY Press.
9) Ester Agustina. (2011). Manajemen Aset Dalam Rangka Optimalisasi Aset Tetap (Tanah dan Bangunan) Pemerintah Daerah
(Studi Kabupaten Paniai). Tesis. Yogyakarta: Program Pascasarjana MEP UGM.
10) Ginting. (2017). Sistem Produksi. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
11) Hendar dan Kusnadi. (2015). Ekonomi Koperasi, Untuk Perguruan Tinggi. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit Fakultas Ekonomi
Universitas Indonesia.
12) Jochen, Ropke. (2013). Ekonomi Koperasi, Teori dan manajemen. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
13) Khasan Setiaji, (2019). Pengaruh Partisipasi Anggota dan Lingkungan Usaha terhadap Keberhasilan KPRI Kapas Kecamatan
Susukan Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang. Semarang.
14) Kotler, Philip. (2013). Manajemen Pemasaran. edisi kesebelas. Jakarta: Gramedia.
15) Laporan RAT 2020 Koperasi KPRI Lentera Kota Mataram Provinsi NTB.
16) Laporan RAT 2020 Koperasi KPRI Serba Guna Kota Mataram Provinsi NTB.
Koperasi Pegawai Republik Indonesia (KPRI) Member Participation on Cooperative Development in Mataram
17) Laporan RAT 2020 Koperasi KPRI Kencana Kota Mataram Provinsi NTB.
18) Limbong Bernhard. (2019). Pengusaha Koperasi. Jakarta: Margaretha Pustaka. Muniya Alteza. (2011). Pengantar Bisnis: Teori
dan Aplikasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: UNY.
19) Ramudi Arifin. (2012). Sisa Hasil Usaha. Seminar Pengkajian Perkoperasian Institut Manajemen Koperasi Indonesia (IKOPIN).
20) Revrisond Baswir. (2017). Koperasi Indonesia. Yogyakarta: BPFE-UGM. Saifudin Azwar. 2009. Tes Prestasi: Fungsi dan
Pengembangan Pengukuran Prestasi belajar. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
21) Sri Widodo. (2018). Pengaruh Komunikasi dan Partisipasi Anggota terhadap Keberhasilan Koperasi Unit Desa Mlati. Jurnal
Akmedika UPY Volume 2.
22) Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung : Alfabeta.
23) Suharsimi Arikunto. (2011). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
24) Suryana. (2013). Kewirausahaan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
25) Sutrisno Hadi. (2014). Metodologi Research Jilid 3. Yogyakarta: Andi.
26) Swasono. (2015). Indonesia dan Doktrin kesejahteraan Sosial. Jakarta: Perkumpulan Prakarsa.
27) Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian Indonesia.
28) uliani. (2017). Hubungan Efisiensi Operasional dengan Kinerja Profitabilitas pada Sektor Perbankan yang Go Publik di Bursa Efek
Jakarta. Jurnal manajemen & bisnis Sriwijaya Vol. 5 No. 10